COMMENTS

@Ines: A very inspring video.... Especially the part where it asks the viewer: "What story is out there waiting to be told by you?"

Thnx for sharing it!

Posted by: freshcreation on 15 Jul 2009 | 11:18 am

@freshcreation: Was reminded of the idea that everything we create is not created by us but through us yesterday when I read that textile workers in Java said no thanks to copyright. In their view, their designs are divine, inspired by God, merely brought to existence through them. And therefore, it does not make sense to put copyright on their designs. - An ingenious solution to copyright discussions, I think
see: http://www.boingboing.net/2009/07/13/javanese-batikers-sa.html

Posted by: ines on 15 Jul 2009 | 02:45 pm

@ines: I agree with their view. To me true fresh creation is not done, it happens.

And copyright was never meant to be used the way it is used now. Read here what Woody Guthrie has to say about the copyright of one of his songs:

http://copyfight.corante.com/archives/2004/07/27/woody_guthrie_on_copyright.php

Posted by: freshcreation on 15 Jul 2009 | 03:35 pm

The two chords on their own mean nothing, but together they tell a story. This strongly reminds me of the entity-relation model: have one note that means relatively little on its own, then have another note for which the same is true and between the two can be a lot of time, even completely different persons taking them. Then: apply logic between them, like the one caused the other, or called for it, or they both belong to a category. Can music be logic? Sting, on NGC, mentioned the cathedral architectures he thinks of when he composes. That also seems to indicate it.

Posted by: roncdeweijze on 15 Jul 2009 | 08:58 pm

LEAVE A COMMENT